Wikileaks-founder raises OpenLeaks "infamy" in front

Wikileaks-founder raises OpenLeaks "infamy" in front

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange authorized the lawyer John Eisenberg mandated with the protection of his interests. In a letter sent by the news agency dpa exists, raises the OpenLeaks-founder Daniel Eisenberg Domscheit Mountain "a heightened level of infamy" in front. Journalists he had given instructions to open encrypted files, and writes thus endangering the lives of innocents, the Berlin lawyer. Eisenberg was already in February against OpenLeaks Domscheit-Berg and Daniel become active when he published his book. His time accusing the former Eisenberg Wikileaks supporters Domscheit mountain of stealing the data sets from Wikileaks.

In his letter, in which no further legal steps will be announced, Eisenberg refers to an article in the weekly newspaper The Friday in which a data leak at Wikileaks [2] in more detail. These details should be published according to Eisenberg, only to damage the reputation of Wikileaks. In addition, the details mentioned led to the alleged threats were afraid to bring a third party only. After Friday, the media is of OpenLeaks, had reported the start of the week as a media partner of Wikileaks mirrors some detail about the vulnerability. This article is not currently complains of Eisenberg.

"From my perspective, this letter is a classic diversionary tactic," said Domscheit-mountain to the dpa. In dealing with the embassy dispatches Wikileaks have now repeatedly made mistakes, in part because "the negligence of Mr. Assange". Now they are available to all. Are also parts of the embassy dispatches "passed by official representatives of Wikileaks and sold" been tossed Domscheit-mountain before unveiling the competing platform. He was now "talking with a journalist of my trust" (Friday) about the problem of publicly available texts.

The New York Times reported that Wikileaks has also recently published and unedited U.S. dispatches to informants at risk. Wikileaks had recently begun to publish many more messages from the various U.S. ambassadors and the knowledge to put many to analyze these dispatches. These publications are, according to the report in the New York Times also contain the names of "some" people who had spoken confidentially with U.S. embassy officials, including a UN employee in West Africa and a human rights activist who works in Cambodia. The New York Times is also sponsor of Wikileaks.

Meanwhile, an unknown man tried to get via Twitter with false statements, the contending parties to see reason and to attract a programmer from the reserve as the "architect" for Wikileaks first, but now is responsible for OpenLeaks for software development. As has been stated motive for his falsification of the unknown, by the appearance of Assange and Domscheit-Berg released at the congress of the Chaos Computer Club from a depression to be, in which he threatened to fall back again. His intervention via Twitter, which generated a large reverberation in the network should provide the actual project, the whistleblower Help attention again.

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange authorized the lawyer John Eisenberg mandated with the protection of his interests. In a letter sent by the news agency dpa exists, raises the OpenLeaks-founder Daniel Eisenberg Domscheit Mountain "a heightened level of infamy" in front. Journalists he had given instructions to open encrypted files, and writes thus endangering the lives of innocents, the Berlin lawyer. Eisenberg was already in February against OpenLeaks Domscheit-Berg and Daniel become active when he published his book. His time accusing the former Eisenberg Wikileaks supporters Domscheit mountain of stealing the data sets from Wikileaks.

In his letter, in which no further legal steps will be announced, Eisenberg refers to an article in the weekly newspaper The Friday in which a data leak at Wikileaks [2] in more detail. These details should be published according to Eisenberg, only to damage the reputation of Wikileaks. In addition, the details mentioned led to the alleged threats were afraid to bring a third party only. After Friday, the media is of OpenLeaks, had reported the start of the week as a media partner of Wikileaks mirrors some detail about the vulnerability. This article is not currently complains of Eisenberg.

"From my perspective, this letter is a classic diversionary tactic," said Domscheit-mountain to the dpa. In dealing with the embassy dispatches Wikileaks have now repeatedly made mistakes, in part because "the negligence of Mr. Assange". Now they are available to all. Are also parts of the embassy dispatches "passed by official representatives of Wikileaks and sold" been tossed Domscheit-mountain before unveiling the competing platform. He was now "talking with a journalist of my trust" (Friday) about the problem of publicly available texts.

The New York Times reported that Wikileaks has also recently published and unedited U.S. dispatches to informants at risk. Wikileaks had recently begun to publish many more messages from the various U.S. ambassadors and the knowledge to put many to analyze these dispatches. These publications are, according to the report in the New York Times also contain the names of "some" people who had spoken confidentially with U.S. embassy officials, including a UN employee in West Africa and a human rights activist who works in Cambodia. The New York Times is also sponsor of Wikileaks.

Meanwhile, an unknown man tried to get via Twitter with false statements, the contending parties to see reason and to attract a programmer from the reserve as the "architect" for Wikileaks first, but now is responsible for OpenLeaks for software development. As has been stated motive for his falsification of the unknown, by the appearance of Assange and Domscheit-Berg released at the congress of the Chaos Computer Club from a depression to be, in which he threatened to fall back again. His intervention via Twitter, which generated a large reverberation in the network should provide the actual project, the whistleblower Help attention again.